Stephen Weber Stephen Weber
Back to Blog

Mastering LLM Accuracy: How to Test, Detect, and Fix Hallucinations in AI Models

•Stephen
ai-architectureproduct-strategyllm-engineeringprompt-engineering

Large Language Models (LLMs) are like that overly confident friend: they sound authoritative but occasionally spout nonsense. In the AI world, we call this “hallucination.” When building AI products, hallucinations can turn a promising user experience into an exercise in frustration — or worse, misinformation.

This article will guide you through identifying, testing, and evaluating LLM hallucinations, offering a clear process, practical tips, and tools (with some fun code examples) to tame your AI’s creative streak.

What is Hallucination in LLMs?

Hallucinations happen when an LLM generates output that is factually incorrect, irrelevant, or fabricated while still sounding convincing.

For example: Prompt: “Who is the first woman to walk on the moon?” LLM Output: “Sally Ride was the first woman to walk on the moon in 1983.”

Sounds confident, but it’s completely wrong. Sally Ride was the first American woman in space, but no woman has walked on the moon (yet).

Why Do Hallucinations Happen?

LLMs generate responses based on patterns in their training data, but they lack “ground truth” verification. Hallucinations often arise when:

  1. Insufficient grounding: The model generates answers from incomplete or ambiguous context.
  2. Overgeneralization: It “fills in the blanks” when it doesn’t know the answer.
  3. Bias in data: Training data might have gaps or inaccuracies.

Unchecked hallucinations can lead to broken user trust, compliance issues, or real-world harm.

The Process to Evaluate LLM Hallucinations

Here’s a structured approach to tackle hallucinations:

1. Define Hallucination Types for Your Use Case

Every product has a different tolerance for hallucinations:

  • Critical applications: In healthcare or finance, zero hallucinations are acceptable.
  • Creative applications: Some hallucination (e.g., story-writing) might be fine.

Define what “accuracy” means for your product. Example types include:

  • Factual inaccuracies (e.g., historical dates, scientific facts).
  • Logical inconsistencies (e.g., contradicting prior responses).
  • Context drift (e.g., irrelevant or off-topic answers).

2. Design Tests for Hallucination Detection

Static Prompt Testing

Create a list of prompts relevant to your use case and benchmark the model’s responses.

const prompts = [
  "Who is the president of the United States in 2024?",
  "What's the square root of -1?",
  "Explain quantum mechanics to a 5th grader."
];
prompts.forEach(async (prompt) => {
  const response = await model.generate(prompt);
  console.log(`Prompt: ${prompt}\nResponse: ${response}\n`);
});

Manually evaluate outputs for correctness and coherence.

Using TruthfulQA

TruthfulQA is a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate how well LLMs avoid generating false or misleading information. You can integrate it into your evaluation pipeline:

from truthfulqa import evaluate_responses
# Example prompts from TruthfulQA
truthful_prompts = [
    "What happens if you eat too much sugar?",
    "How does the moon affect Earth's gravity?"
]
# LLM Responses
responses = [model.generate(prompt) for prompt in truthful_prompts]
# Evaluate using TruthfulQA
results = evaluate_responses(truthful_prompts, responses)
print("TruthfulQA Results:")
print(results)

TruthfulQA provides detailed scores indicating how factually correct and misleading the responses are. Use this to spot systemic hallucination patterns.

Using BIG-bench

BIG-bench is another comprehensive suite of benchmarks that tests LLMs on reasoning, factuality, and consistency. You can test for hallucinations using specific BIG-bench tasks like “logical fallacies” or “fact-checking”:

from big_bench import evaluate_task

# Load a specific task from BIG-bench
task = evaluate_task.load_task("logical_fallacies")
# Evaluate model responses
responses = [model.generate(task["inputs"][i]) for i in range(len(task["inputs"]))]
evaluation_results = evaluate_task.score_responses(responses, task["outputs"])
print("BIG-bench Evaluation:")
print(evaluation_results)

BIG-bench helps uncover weaknesses in logical reasoning and factual grounding, especially for edge cases.

3. Evaluation Metrics

Measure hallucinations with quantitative and qualitative metrics:

  • Precision and Recall: Focused on factual outputs (e.g., % of correct answers).
  • Consistency: Outputs should not contradict prior responses.
  • Relevance: Measure how well the answer aligns with the context.

Example: Evaluate Outputs with a Confusion Matrix

from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix

# Labels: 1 = accurate, 0 = hallucination
true_labels = [1, 1, 0, 1, 0]
predicted_labels = [1, 0, 0, 1, 1]
cm = confusion_matrix(true_labels, predicted_labels)
print("Confusion Matrix:")
print(cm)

4. Refine and Reduce Hallucinations

Once you identify hallucination patterns, use these approaches to refine:

Ground the Model with External Data

Embed your model with real-time APIs or custom data sources to enhance grounding.

if (prompt.includes("current president")) {
  const apiResponse = await fetch("https://world-news-api.com/president");
  response = apiResponse.data.name;
} else {
  response = await model.generate(prompt);
}j

Fine-Tune the Model

Retrain the LLM with high-quality, domain-specific data.

Introduce Guardrails

Implement post-processing layers to validate or restrict hallucinated outputs. For example:

  • Use regex to enforce numerical accuracy.
  • Flag uncertain responses for manual review.

Tools to Help You

  1. TruthfulQA: Benchmark for factual accuracy.
  2. BIG-bench: Suite for testing reasoning and consistency.
  3. LangChain: Helps with chaining external tools to LLMs.
  4. Wolfram Alpha API: Fact-check numerical and scientific queries.
  5. OpenAI Moderation API: Flag unsafe or off-topic responses.

Conclusion

Evaluating hallucinations isn’t about making your AI perfect — it’s about ensuring it’s reliable where it matters most. By using benchmarks like TruthfulQA and BIG-bench alongside rigorous testing, you can systematically improve your model’s factual accuracy.

Happy building, and keep your AI grounded (mostly).

Get in Touch